Learning: Cognitive or Experiential

C Rogers classifies learning of two different types:
1. Cognitive
2. Experiential

Cognitive learning primarily deals with academic learning for example learning vocalubary, multiplication tables, solving trigonometric equations etc. Whereas, experiential learning refers to applied knowledge for example learning about aerodynamics if you want to build a mini-plane for your science project. From my experience, Indian education system is dominated by cognitive learning with extreme focus on ranks, percentages obtained etc.

Since, there are two broad categories of learning, a logical question that would come out would be which learning methodology is superior? Many folks would believe that experiental learning is superior and advantageous and true it is. However, in my humble opinion there is a place and space for cognitive learning as well. Absurd it may sound, however, cognitive learning is much more easier to scale and in developing countries is a good model for education delivery.

Rogers also talks about the role of teacher in the experiential methodology, which is related to my earlier post. Roger says "experiential learning is equivalent to personal change and growth. Rogers feels that all human beings have a natural propensity to learn; the role of the teacher is to facilitate such learning. This includes: (1) setting a positive climate for learning, (2) clarifying the purposes of the learner(s), (3) organizing and making available learning resources, (4) balancing intellectual and emotional components of learning, and (5) sharing feelings and thoughts with learners but not dominating."

Well, the jury is still out to decide on the efficacy of both these forms of learning as mass education delivery modules. However, I have my pick and that being a right balance of both in every kid's life and that's where buildingBlocks comes in.